VEFX-Bench v1.0 — frozen on 2026-08-03
A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating video editing models across 300 videos, 9 task categories, and 3 quality dimensions.
This frozen protocol fixes the dataset, task taxonomy, evaluator checkpoint, and aggregation rule.
Download Dataset
Download the immutable benchmark snapshot from Hugging Face. It contains 300 source videos with their corresponding editing instructions and the v1.0 manifest.
Download frozen v1.0 snapshotDataset revision: 3bf997e7eb4fa0d0c2d56cce5ddfccc1dfbda235
Frozen Reproducibility Identifiers
Use these immutable identifiers to reproduce the v1.0 evaluation protocol exactly.
- Hugging Face dataset revision
- 3bf997e7eb4fa0d0c2d56cce5ddfccc1dfbda235
- Manifest SHA-256
- 277d89f5cf23af4163fe6ee120654210f51d19c6dee2d3aa76a3248471d1f333
- Reward model revision
- a15a8dbe1b3eb07ee0919e8de059f170436ec9ff
- Checkpoint SHA-256
- c3c0d03f770f0a73631206821922213de75413bb517f7d7a2fd9ab1f2c38f59d
Submission Format
After running your video editing model on all benchmark videos, package the results as follows:
Create a .zip file containing 300 edited videos.
Name files as 0000.mp4, 0001.mp4, …, 0299.mp4
Each video should be the edited version of the corresponding original video in the benchmark dataset.
Task Categories
The benchmark covers 9 distinct editing categories:
Evaluation Metrics
Each video is evaluated along three complementary dimensions using the frozen VEFX-Reward model. Overall is the mean of item-level GeoAgg scores and is the primary ranking metric.
Exact aggregation order (N = 300)
i_j = (IF_j − 1) / 3, r_j = (RQ_j − 1) / 3, e_j = (EE_j − 1) / 3
g_j = 1 + 3 × (i_j² × r_j × e_j)^(1/4)
Overall = (1 / N) × Σ[j=1…N] g_j
The evaluator first computes GeoAgg for each item, then averages the 300 item-level values. It does not compute GeoAgg from the three dataset-level dimension means. The arithmetic Mean is diagnostic only and never determines rank.
Overall (GeoAgg) ★
Mean of per-item weighted geometric aggregates; IF has weight 2. This is the primary ranking metric.
Range: 1-4 · Higher is better
Instructional Following (IF)
Measures how well the edited video follows the editing instruction.
Range: 1-4 · Higher is better
Render Quality (RQ)
Measures the visual rendering quality of the edited video.
Range: 1-4 · Higher is better
Edit Exclusivity (EE)
Measures whether only the intended region/attribute was edited without side effects.
Range: 1-4 · Higher is better
Scoring Rubric
Each dimension is scored on a 1–4 scale:
| Score | Level | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Excellent | Fully satisfies the criterion with no noticeable issues. |
| 3 | Good | Mostly satisfies the criterion with minor shortcomings. |
| 2 | Fair | Partially satisfies the criterion with noticeable issues. |
| 1 | Poor | Fails to satisfy the criterion or has severe issues. |